Please assign this to my prefer writer id 286370. I have already paid for the prefer writer fee. This is a two part assignment.
Part I. The first part is to answer the question listed below and second part is to review four peers paper and follow the response guidelines. Please answer and label the questions accordingly. This is a critical thinking, graduate level essay. Part I: Answer the two questions separately with two additional references are required. 2. In-text citation on every paragraph. 3. Please label all subheading. 4. APA formatting and style. My professor reviews my paper and will provide feedback and she usually requires for addition clarification in regards to what have been written. Therefore, I will forward to you the question(s) from my professor. Please answer the question(s) accordingly. Per class requirement, all papers must be submitted to Smarthinking for review before I can submit it in therefore please revise the paper according to Smarthinking suggestion.
Part II: Response Guidelines- please follow direction for response guidelines. In-text citation. Course Reading Material: May, C. B., & May, G. S. (2012). Effective Writing: A Handbook for Accountants (9th ed.). Boston: Prentice Hall. Essential guide to APA style for Walden students. (2014). Retrieved from http://www.vitalsource.com
Effective Writing: A Handbook for Accountants. Chapter 11, “Reports” This chapter provides detailed guidance for planning, organizing, and presenting written reports of various styles. Article
Short, K. (2010). Let’s hear it for the blog! Accounting Today, 24(3), 22. Retrieved from Accounting & Tax Periodicals database
This article offers insights into how the accounting industry has adapted to changes in technology use and how those technology advances have changed the methods of communication.
Q1: Communicating Through Presentation
Having your colleagues review a report you have prepared prior to presenting it to senior executives or distributing it to external audiences can help you to improve or refine your work before finalization. Peer review can provide an opportunity for idea generation, as well, which can help contribute to a better final product.
Recall one of your executive summaries submitted as part of the Week 5 Application. Prepare a brief PowerPoint presentation of either your internal or external executive summary. Paste the text of the corresponding executive summary into the Discussion forum to provide context to the PowerPoint presentation, which should be attached to the Discussion forum.
Ask a probing question.
Share an insight from having read your colleagues’ postings.
Offer and support an opinion.
Validate an idea with your own experience.
Make a suggestion.
Expand on your colleagues’ postings.